This is a theme I’ve tangentially touched on before, but it is time to detail the methodology a bit more. In the courses I teach, and now more broadly within the Media program that I’ve managed a lot of curriculum innovation within, it is pretty much accepted that students ought to learn how to take responsibility for significant aspects of their own learning.
Within the Media program this is gradated over the three years of their undergrad experience, so that in first year this is heavily defined and scaffolded by staff, in second year it will be a combination of staff support and student selection, and by third year it will be completely student defined. In first year this means that as a result of the process described below the entire class cohort undertakes the same format of participatory assessment.
(In their second year I expect a group process to develop the key activities within this exercise, but then students will individually select those things they want to include to make or define their participation within an individual subject.)
So, we let students self assess their participation. How? In first year in our first lecture everyone draws a simple graph: how much do they know about topic/content area x now, how much do they think they’ll know at the end. Everyone draws a line that goes up. What is emphasised is that this line has nothing to do with me as their teacher but is a contract and decision made by them that they actually expect, want and intend to learn. Simple, but the point needs to be reinforced constantly – they want to learn something and that is their doing.
We then make a list of all the activities that they can think of that they would need to do to make sure that their learning line does rise during the course of the semester. This includes things like attending classes, sharing ideas, asking about what you don’t know, using the library, but can also include things like taking risks, or even (in a recent group) getting grubby. I take this list, tidy it up, and turn it into an assessment diary where each of the individual items can be rated and an overall mark given. This diary is filled in at the beginning of class every week.
At the end of semester each student goes through their diary and assigns an overall participation mark for their semester. They have to tell the class what result they are giving themselves, what they did well during the semester what they learnt to do better, and what they could have done better. This mark stands, and it usually constitutes 30% of their final mark for the subject. The qualitative questions help the students assess and contextualise their participation, and it also works as a check as they can always recognise things they could have done better and so they need to determine how much better they ought to have done things in relation to the mark they give themselves.
The rationale for this should be obvious. It breaks the assumption that participation equals attendance, which is in general an appalling index of participation. It lets students define what constitutes this part of their assessment, the task is given a weighting (30%) in keeping with our student centred rhetoric – after all if I tell my students that you’ll only get out what you put in, and participation is valued and important, but they see it is worth 10% and appears to be based on a class roll, then my behaviour indicates the contrary of what I say (and if I’m not fair dinkum about that, why take anything else seriously?) – and it also frees me from the ‘reading of tea leaves’ that assessing participation largely is, particularly in university contexts.
I have done this for three years now, and to date it has been abused once, by a mature age professional male enrolled in a professional Masters program. It has never been abused by undergraduates, and I’ve never had a student, except for the ‘mature’ student, ever give a result that I would question.
Its relation to media studies and pedagogy? These students are graduating into the creative industries where an understanding of your strengths and weaknesses in terms of research ability, creative ability (are you someone who invents great ideas or someone who takes other ideas and brings them to completion?) and general professional competencies is crucial. In these industries your boss will not manage this for you, and in most contexts they will be part of small creative teams that self define large parts of what they do. Developing some resources that lets these processes be assessed, become visible, and also addressed, is necessary.
Tags:
hypertext,
Network Literacy