Amendment to the Manifesto

I originally wrote vogma (a manifesto for vogs) on December 6, 2000. I amended it on February 2, 2002. Some time this year (so the date of this entry can be the ate of amendment) I amended it again.

(After all, what’s the point of a 21stC manifesto if it can’t actually mutate?)

The Manifesto, currently, reads:

  1. a vog respects bandwidth
  2. a vog is not streaming video (this is not the reinvention of television)
  3. a vog uses performative video and/or audio
  4. a vog is personal
  5. a vog uses available technology
  6. a vog experiments with writerly video and audio
  7. a vog lies between writing and the televisual
  8. a vog explores the proximate distance of words and moving media
  9. a vog is dziga vertov with a mac and a modem
  10. a vog is Jean Luc-Godard with a mac and a modem
  11. a vog is a video blog where video in a blog must be more than video in a blog

I have this naive ‘osmosis’ theory where I think that if I write something like this, it will just make sense and the job is done. This is why my research output is so thin, particularly around vogs, I think the above says an awful lot and turning each point into an essay (which would be easy) is just some sort of academic sleight of hand. On the other hand it is probably what I should be doing – because I’d be pissed if someone else did, I know a lot about this stuff, I care deeply about it, and <feigns deep indignation and misunderstanding>I should realise most people, most of the time, don’t get what I’m on about.</feigns deep indignation and misunderstanding>

Tags: ,