<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: process writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vogmae.net.au/vlog/2006/11/process-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vogmae.net.au/vlog/2006/11/process-writing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vlog 3.0 [a blog about vogs] &#187; Blogs and Documentary (all middle)</title>
		<link>http://vogmae.net.au/vlog/2006/11/process-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-79135</link>
		<dc:creator>vlog 3.0 [a blog about vogs] &#187; Blogs and Documentary (all middle)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vlog/archives/2006/11/15/process-writing/#comment-79135</guid>
		<description>[...] This thing about things being in parts is the very heart of the web. I put photos in flickr, but there they stay as individual photos. From there I can blog them, turn them into slideshows, and of course find other&#8217;s photos. I can even participate in creative collaborations. Since most of my photos have specific creative commons rights attached to them, others can use them too. Remember what is stenciled across your editing screen (you did do that didn&#8217;t you?), the photos stay as single photos even though they are now tagged by me and others, turn up in my blog, form archives, slideshows, and so on. Their granularity is not broken through publication. The same applies for video and audio. This is what is meant by user generated content, which does not just mean a mountain of wannabe&#8217;s pumping out their content (a loud shout of &#8220;me!&#8221;) but it is also a willingness to share this and to rework and build with each other&#8217;s material. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This thing about things being in parts is the very heart of the web. I put photos in flickr, but there they stay as individual photos. From there I can blog them, turn them into slideshows, and of course find other&#8217;s photos. I can even participate in creative collaborations. Since most of my photos have specific creative commons rights attached to them, others can use them too. Remember what is stenciled across your editing screen (you did do that didn&#8217;t you?), the photos stay as single photos even though they are now tagged by me and others, turn up in my blog, form archives, slideshows, and so on. Their granularity is not broken through publication. The same applies for video and audio. This is what is meant by user generated content, which does not just mean a mountain of wannabe&#8217;s pumping out their content (a loud shout of &#8220;me!&#8221;) but it is also a willingness to share this and to rework and build with each other&#8217;s material. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
