Bit of a bee in my bonnet from a brief exchange during last weekends Art and Design Graduate Research Conference at RMIT. It was just an aside about Web 2 things not being about learning, which I disagreed with. I used the example of blogs as very valuable learning environments and very basic to Web 2 architectures. The conversation didn’t go far, as it wasn’t relevant to what needed to be discussed, but I was struck by my co-respondent’s comment that they’d also asked their students to blog and it was apparent from their demeanor that it had not been successful.
Quick observations (as I am tired of people introducing blogging only to find it doesn’t ‘work’).
This person teaches and practices design. I would think that, like all other academics, they tend to get students to produce things that they themselves do. Eg write essays (since we publish), present a tute paper (conference presentation), sit an exam (good empiricists), and so on. In TV you get them to make content of some form, and as the academic you have made TV content too. Similarly in design disciplines you don’t generally set them briefs outside of your own practice. So if you don’t blog, why ask students to blog? That’s like asking them to write essays where your own discipline, and practice, doesn’t actually do any essay writing. Why does this matter? Well, in my case (humanities) my students have had approximately 12 years of training in writing, and at least 4 in very specialised ‘how to write essay’ training. A blog is not an essay. It is a different form, so pointing students to blogs and asking them to blogs is akin to pointing my humanities students to a sketch book and asking them to ‘sketch’, then because no one actually sketches, or knows what or how to sketch, I can declare that sketching, visual diaries, and all that don’t work.
However if I sketched myself, and had a visual diary, I could probably work out how to integrate its use. Explain why it matters. Scaffold its use so that you get over that bump of resistance until the practice becomes embedded, and so on. So the method is just a nonsense. In the same way you can’t point a group of fine art students to an essay, ask them to write a 5000 word critical essay, and then because the engagement with argument and theory is so bad declare that essay’s don’t work!
Oh, what I’ve written above is two points. Muddled up. The first is that blogging needs to be taught and if it isn’t taught then of course it is not going to ‘work’. The second is why teach practices that you don’t use yourself? If you don’t keep a notebook or journal, then why ask your students to? If you don’t blog why expect your students to? This is not about legitimacy but literacy, because it is the literacy of the notebook, diary, and blog that you need to teach and you only have that literacy by doing.
Tags:
Network Literacy,
practice